Next.js websites and web apps.
We use Next.js where its rendering, routing, and data tools fit the project. The approach depends on your content, integrations, and hosting requirements.
What we focus on.
These priorities shape the scope and the decisions we make during the build.
Next.js features selected for the needs of each route.
Rendering strategy chosen per route (SSG, ISR, SSR, edge) instead of one default.
Caching, revalidation, and tag-based invalidation built into the data layer.
What we build into every Next.js engagement.
Architecture, build, deploy, and the operational layer that keeps it cheap to run.
App Router architecture
Route groups, parallel routes, intercepted routes, and loading/error boundaries used the way the docs intend.
Rendering-mode map
A per-route decision: static, ISR, SSR, edge SSR, or client. Documented in the repo. Reviewable.
Data layer with revalidation
Server fetches with cache tags. Server actions that invalidate tags on write. Updates reflected according to the content and caching requirements.
Edge runtime where it pays
Cookie-based personalization, geo routing, AB-test flags — moved to the edge so origins stay cold.
Four phases. Next.js-specific decisions baked in.
The phase names match every other engagement. The internals shift to surface Next.js-specific decisions early.
Discovery
Audit the existing stack, the conversion targets, the data sources, and the constraints (CMS, auth, third-party services).
Strategy
Per-route rendering map, caching strategy, data-layer design, Vercel deploy target plan. Signed off before scaffolding.
Build
Pages, components, data layer, server actions, edge personalization. Performance checks during development.
Ship
Deployment, monitoring, documentation, and a review of expected operating costs.
Building on Next.js — or migrating to it?
Tell us the routes, the data sources, the constraints. We’ll map the rendering strategy, scope the build, and tell you honestly whether Next.js is the right call for what you’re trying to ship.